TR
Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal Yýl:2022  Sayý: 41  Alan: Hukuk

Hüseyin TANGÜNER
ANONÝM ÞÝRKETLERDE YÖNETÝM KURULU ÜYELERÝNÝN SORUMLULUÐU VE ÝÞ ADAMI KARARI ÝLKESÝ
 
Türk Ticaret Kanunu m. 553 hükmünde kurucular, yönetim kurulundaki üyeler, yöneticilerle tasfiye memurlarý yasayla esas sözleþmeden kaynaklanan görevlerini kusurlarý ile ihlal ettiklerinde meydana gelen zarardan ortaklýða, hisse sahipleriyle alacaklýlara karþý sorumlu olacaklarý hüküm altýna alýnarak genel sorumluluk hali düzenlenmiþtir. Ancak bu sorumluluk iþ insaný kararý (business judgment rule) ilkesiyle sýnýrlandýrýlmaktadýr. Nitekim Yönetim kurulunun takdir yetkisine dayanarak vermiþ olduðu kararlar sebebiyle meydana gelen zararlardan her halükarda sorumlu olmalarý pasifleþmelerine sebebiyet verecektir. Bu anlamda Ýþ adamý kararý ilkesi güvenilir bir liman olacaktýr.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Sermaye þirketleri, Yönetim Kurulu Üyelerinin Genel Sorumluluk Halleri, Sorumluluk Davasý, Ýþ adamý kararý ilkesi,


RESPONSIBILITY OF MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND BUSINESS JUDGEMENT RULE IN JOINT STOCK COMPANIES
 
A general liability is regulated in Article 553 of Turkish Commercial Code that the founders, members of the board of directors, managers and liquidators are liable to the partnership, shareholders and creditors for the losses incurred if they violate their duties arising from the law and the articles of association. However, this responsibility is limited by the business judgment rule. As a matter of fact, the fact that the Board of Directors is responsible for the losses incurred in every way due to the decisions it has taken based on its discretion will cause the board of directors to become more passive. In this sense, the business judgement rule will be a reliable source for all parts.

Keywords: Capital companies, General Liability of Board Members, Liability Litigation, Business Judgement Rule.


Detay

�ÇER�K